This one goes to my homeboys: flying pigs, the king of the icy wing in Hell, and my unicorn fairy gremlin. (Photo by Chris Graythen/Getty Images)
The thrilla' in Nawlins featured the Bulls stampeding (thumbs up, right?) over the Hornets in a way that threatened the home team's franchise-record for least points in a game. But a final second three by Marco Belinelli prevented the Bulls from altering the Earth's axis.
The Bulls opened the game with a 9-0 run that became a 15-4 run that became a 21-8 Bulls lead with 2:40 remaining in the first quarter [.pdf]. With reserves that would get Brian Scalabrine minutes on just about any other NBA team about to come off the bench for the injury-riddled Hornets, it was clear that this game had already become ugly and was threatening the world to go on a Bon-Bon diet and flush its face with acid.
It was a game where Chris Kaman outscored the rest of his team by six off the bench, scoring ten in that first quarter; and following that up with almost eight scoreless minutes in the second, before finishing with a team-high 17 points on the night.
The night was magical:
A mediocre center went off on the Bulls in the first quarter;
Luol Deng played over 34 minutes in a game where the Bulls were up by 24 after three quarters;
The Bulls out-rebounded their opponents by ten, scoring 16 second chance points to their opponents' six;
The Bulls held their opponents to one fastbreak point;
The Bulls outscored their opponents 58-40 in the paint;
The Bulls scored 29 (!!!) points on their opponents' 19 turnovers;
The Bulls only took 12 trips to the FT line;
The Bulls only scored 90;
The Bulls won;
The Bulls' opponents entered the game 4-21, Jarrett Jack as their scoring leader, and something called Gustavo Ayon with the team's highest PER;
The Bulls won by 23.
Yeah, this game was about the Bulls-iest blowout you're gonna find this year.
The 90 points really shouldn't be alarming, as there wasn't much aggressiveness going on when the outcome was clearly expressed by the Hornets' 31 points in the first quarter half. There were only 25 total fouls in the whole game, as the game was pretty much signed, sealed, and delivered to the Bulls when Eric Gordon and Carl Landry were in suits and Jack was playing through a sore left knee -- on top of being a self-aware, larger-than-the-elephant deficiency controlled by conflicting interests.
And it's a bit sad because the Hornets have had so many sparks of being an interesting franchise that started in a legacy basketball state, only to move to one of the most enlightening, lively cities filled with some of the most interesting people, music, and food in America. The trade of Chris Paul to the Clippers was necessary for the star to get out of the NBA-owned clusterfrack and the arrival of Gordon, Kaman, and Al-Farouq Aminu in return to play for a solid coach in Monty Williams seemed to be promising.
No one expected the Hornets to make a repeat run to the playoffs, but their power forwards and centers are a pretty damn good accumulation of talent with Gordon and Jack. The bigs alone should be enough to pull out about a .400 record.
But the actual 2012 Hornets are a giant mess. It's like they were already contracted, but no one told the schedule makers.
Good game, Carlos Boozer. He scored a game-high 18 points on 8-for-15, grabbing only six boards, but added three assists in only 28:24. Emeka Okafor pushed him around when Boozer got position on the block, but it wasn't Boozer lack of trying to go down low. Okafor's just simply bigger and stuck to Booz when Kaman was the center.
When Joakim Noah is bad, it's unwatchable; when he's good, it's some of the basketball most worth consuming. The Hornets suck, this we already know; but down low, there are some guys who'll pound you down. Noah and Booz didn't force their offense. They moved the ball extremely well and navigated through space. Noah's 13 points on 6-for-7 shooting and ten rebounds marked his first double-double in the last five games after a streak of six in seven games, despite playing only 29 minutes.
NOLA shot 6-for-24 in the third quarter, and still scored one point more than in the first. After crediting the Bulls D, Williams said, "In that third quarter, I don't know how many open looks we had. [...] We just couldn't throw it in the ocean. We had 75 attempts and 19 turnovers."
Hooray for Bench Mob! They scored 39 points in, well, 39 shots to go with 19 rebounds, led by Taj Gibson's 14 on 5-for-12 and six boards, along with Omer Asik's eight rebounds and Kyle Korver's 12 points. And Korver's solid... defense (yes, some very nice defense to put NOLA deep in shot clocks).
Derrick Rose hasn't been mentioned in this post, and that's a good thing. It was a 'no news is good news' night for Rose. He said his back was fine Wednesday morning -- after leaving Monday's game with spasms that had haunted him for a few days -- and played fine in New Orleans. Only six points, but on only 3-for-5 shooting. He grabbed five boards and dished six assists, but the key to the game was putting the Hornets away early. Rose teammates did just that and the reigning MVP was held to only 22:22 of playing time. After the game, he said his back was "kind of tight". Being on a two-week road trip makes this worse because of the constant flying, whether or not he plays, as there's no reason to believe he wouldn't travel with the team enduring an injury that's day-to-day.
Tom Thibodeausaid after the game: "If a guy is injured, he shouldn't play. But if he can play, he should play. Somehow there's this notion of guys sitting out games. Pretty soon we'll be at the point where a guy sits out the whole season and just plays in the playoffs — if he can get there. I don't get that. [...] If he could do further damage, we won't take that chance. [...] If you cut back practice time and do more film (study), you can get rest. How you pace your team is important, so you can be healthy at the end of the season and playing your best. Can you develop the proper habits you need to be successful late (in the season)? The only way you build those habits is by doing your work. If you don't do your work and expect to play well at the end, that's just foolish."
Thibs doesn't understand the question, "Was it an ugly game?". There's something very meta about that. I just haven't figured it out yet.
The highlight of the game was clearly Will Ferrell introducing the starting lineups:
Wednesday was the first time in NBA history that a team won by at least 20 in three straight games of a road trip. Next up is the NBA-worst 3-22 Bobcats on Friday in Charlotte, so we should expect an extension of that. The Bulls advanced to 22-6 and extended their Eastern Conference lead to two games with the Magic102-89 win over the Heat.
On a closing note, and with no intention to frivolously "go there", but Dwight Howard teabagged the reigning East champs for 25 points on 9-for-14, 24 rebounds and two blocks to go with three steals and three assists on Wednesday. The Magic are now 3-2 versus Miami since LeBron James, Dwyane Wade, and Chris Bosh forged their little alliance, led by Howard's 19.8 PPG, shooting almost 57%, 16.6 RPG and only 16 total fouls in their five matchups.
1recs |
94
comments
Comments
The biggest difference between this year and last
is that last year, when facing a depleted cellar-dwelling team, the Bulls would play down to their level and end up needing a 4th quarter push to win comfortably. This year they’re destroying teams right out the gate; giving more opportunity to rest Rose and others.
This should greatly help the fatigue factor come playoff time.
Yep, definitely a big difference between last year. Murder them by 20 instead of dragging it out into a 95-89 or 89-85 or 90-87 "too close for comfort" win
mean that teams who chuck 3s relentlessly with one interior option can beat the Heat? So basically, start Rose, Korver, CJ, Rip and Deng. Let Omer set a pick, Rose penetrates (therefore being the ‘interior option’), kick out out, swing it around the perimeter and la-ti-da!
I think it means that teams with a ton of 3pt shooters can have good nights and score a ton of points. I think this bodes well for the Bulls when healthy. Hamilton and Deng are good shooters and Boozer is too. Rose should have room to work with and plenty of guys to kick to. Last night made pine even harder for Howard though. A lineup of Rose/Hamilton/Korver/Deng/Howard would absolutely destroy the Heat.
When they’re hitting threes, they can beat pretty much anyone, but when they’re not, yikes. No creators, nothing in transition, no easy baskets, Hard to see them having a ton of success in the postseason with that formula. Maybe win a series, but they’ll eventually cool off
If a guy is injured, he shouldn’t play. But if he can play, he should play.
This really does seem to confirm the perception that Thibs resembles (some) football coaches when it comes to injuries.
You good to go, Derrick (or Rip, etc.)?
I’m ready, coach.
Case closed. He obviously can, and should play!
Somehow there’s this notion of guys sitting out games. Pretty soon we’ll be at the point where a guy sits out the whole season and just plays in the playoffs — if he can get there. I don’t get that.
This really takes the cake. A player who has an injury that could easily be aggravated (e.g. groin, back, toe, etc.) is asked to play heavy minutes in blowouts because – seriously – if you sit that player, the next step would be for him to sit out the whole season?.
I really like Thibs as a coach, but this is an embarrassing response to very valid questions about injury management.
If he could do further damage, we won’t take that chance.
I try not to listen to him when it comes to injuries
the actions are enough. I’m pleasantly surprised Rose only played 22 minutes last night. I’d rather he just sat, but still encouraging that Thibs actually used some tact. (apparently not so much with security blanket Deng)
Defining Moment: The Hornets fans always remain standing until New Orleans scores its first points. After a timeout four minutes in, fans sat down even though the Hornets had yet to score.
Yeah, in lieu of this, do you think that the vetoed trade was better or worse?
Conventional wisdom is that it is good to blow seasons and work the draft. I think this is stupid. You completely alienate your fan base. Look at Charlotte. Does anyone actually like that team? New Orleans could have been a middle of the pack team with the initial trade and at least presented a reasonable product for the money. Now they are simply a joke. If there is anything that is hurting league parity, it is this. I think that they should have some sort of control on how bad you can be. Maybe ship the worst teams to the D-league like they do in soccer.
I mean, Gordon’s had and injury history, but when healthy, he’s a great piece to start a rebuild with.
Actually, his injury could be a blessing in disguise (if he ever stops being injured). If they go on to lose at this rate, they should have a very high pick, and that would give them another nice piece to put next to Gordon. Then you add in Minnesota’s draft pick which they also got in the trade, which prob won’t be as high as previously thought, but still likely in the Lotto (imo), and you’re talking about a team that could be nicely stocked with young players next season.
I’d rather have all that than a middling team that would eventually have to tear down and rebuild in a few years anyway
Looking at the Wizards, I am very skeptical about rebuilding without veteran presence...
they have a few vets, but they are mainly a bunch of dumb kids. I think this may end up ruining careers as they never enter into a system in which they can self-actualize.
Look at the Spurs, they take mediocre talent and turn out quality players. A team with no veteran presence and no organizational identity takes heavy talent and spits out mediocrity. I think that this is the future of Charlotte, Washington and, now, New Orleans.
Yeah, but the Wizards are kind of unique, in that, they keep bringing in complete doofuses
I don’t think they need vets as much as just smarter players. They’re banking on hitting on some high picks like Vesely, and whoever they bring in next year. I don’t think that’s a bad way to go.
They actually could be fantastic 2 years down the road
At their point in the draft, they could end up with one of Anthony Davis, Andre Drummond, or Jared Sullinger. Those are all solid big men. Around Minnesota’s pick, they could nab Austin Rivers (long shot, unless the TWolves start losing), or Jeff Taylor from Vandy (he could be instant scoring help). If they can get rid of Okafor some time before 2013 free agency, they will have a crap ton of cap room and lot’s of young talent.
A lineup of: Jack/Gordon/Taylor/Sullinger/Okafor could be pretty darn good. Get rid of Okafor before 2013 and bring in a solid C or PG, and they should be a dang good team. They might (I emphasize might) be able to snag Steph Curry from Golden state as they will have a ton of salary invested in Lee, Ellis, and Biedrins. If they don’t get rid of Ellis or Curry before then, they might not be able to match offers. Again, a ton of luck recquired here, but they could end up with a very good team without much effort.
My point is, even with these names, it is not clear that they will be a real basketball team.
If you do not have a strong organization and some kind of team continuity, it is very difficult to turn even top flight draft talent into a strong team. Washington has done everything right in the draft (according to the conventional wisdom) for the last two years, and there is no light at the end of the tunnel.
Is there one example of a team that has been completely blown up and then returned a high level of competition within a few years? The slow build is probably the wiser course. It may be difficult to nab that elusive superstar, but it is not impossible (1.7%!, Duncan, LA’s trade contortions to snag Kobe). Any thoughts?
Look, you can't be pissed at Stern for vetoing a trade
that would have netted LESS than they received in the end. Either you hate him for tampering, which a lot of people thought was inethical and hypocritical, or you hate him for gutting the team with a stupid and insider-dealing trade. You can’t hate him for both. And most would agree the Hornets got great value for a star who was leaving regardless. It’s a sad situation, but nothing save for quality management would have made it better.
Stern still sucks. No matter how he handled that debacle.
In fact, it was a debacle when he stuck his nose in. Supposedly he is all about ‘parity’ in the league, yet for a long time he endorsed the Knicks and Lakers, especially when the Knicks were good, and anyway, where was he in July 2010 when Lebron ‘announced’ he was ‘taking his talents to South Beach??’ I guess the Heatles didn’t fudge pack themselves with enough all stars, hence Stern didn’t have any problems and didn’t veto the trade.
“If a guy is injured, he shouldn’t play. But if he can play, he should play. Somehow there’s this notion of guys sitting out games. Pretty soon we’ll be at the point where a guy sits out the whole season and just plays in the playoffs — if he can get there. I don’t get that.”
What I don’t get is that, isn’t this basically what the Bulls are doing with Rip Hamilton right now? Thibs himself has said that he doesn’t wanna see Rip come in and out of the lineup, and that they wanna see him get fully healthy. Ok, so why doesn’t that also apply to the league MVP?
Because Rose can play effectively with his injuries,
while Rip can’t? And maybe they believe that Rose’s injury is what it is and won’t get worse while Rip’s obviously does get worse.
I’ll say this much, if Rose didn’t have a back issue, he’d have played his usual 37 minutes last night, even with his known toe problem. The reason is that the back actually prevents him from playing well and, the toe doesn’t.
Basically, Thibs is saying that he’s OK with playing his guys when they’re hurt, but not when they’re injured. That’s fine with me.
First it is painfully obvious (pun intended) that Rose is not the same player with this back issue. He (understandably) plays in a restrained manner (did you notice when he didn’t even want to be involved in a break in last night’s game? He basically pulled himself up after crossing half-court.), and clearly lacks the explosiveness that we have come to expect.
if Rose didn’t have a back issue, he’d have played his usual 37 minutes last night
True, but why play him at all? I agree that the toe is probably not going to get worse unless it takes a direct hit, but when he has been suffering from back problems for several games now, why play him at all against a team that they can beat handily without him? Is there really an argument that complete rest wouldn’t accelerate the healing process?
Thibs pulled him early because the back injury was clearly holding him back. The toe hasn’t, he was throwing down tomahawks against Boston his first game back after the toe thing.
Yeah, having watched the thing again on youtube (via Yahoo ball don't lie)
I am not sure why some thought that players didnt’ find it funny. I am sure there were one or two who weren’t as amused, but in general they seemed to enjoy it and were chuckling. Doing this once in a while is pretty cool and refreshing. We should get Bill Murray to do this at our home games, lol! Who is with me??
Boozer was specifically quoted as saying something to the effect of:
“Will Ferrell is one of the funniest dudes of our generation,” and, “We all love him,” so I’m not sure why anyone would get the impression that the players didn’t like it.
read this in a comment section, thought it was hilarious, so i had to post..just cuz:
Carmelo Anthony’s it up stares at comment box tells teammates to get away fakes hitting several keys for almost 24 seconds puts head fake on the other open windows puts shoulder fake on monitor ignores teammates yelling at me to submit comment jab steps right with mouse jabs steps left with mouse dribbles mouse pad between my legs nohomo steps back 23 feet from the keyboard tries to submit comment while 3 people are surrounding me up jumping on my modem gets wordpress message that my email and name are required and comment doesnt go through tells reporters "MAYBE" its my fault my comment didnt go through, while blaming yfbb anyway
that the only player the guys from Inside the NBA did NOT say ‘well deserved’ to was Luol. None of them, besides for EJ, had him in their projected reserve list. Charles and Kenny had 2 Pacers, Shaq had Josh freaking Smith, and Webber was completely off the reservation with Ray Allen, Jrue Holiday and Josh Smith. So the best team by record in the NBA only deserves 1 All Star for the second year in a row? Are the Pacers more deserving?
I agree with Barkely about what he’s saying about Pierce getting in only because he’s played well for a couple of weeks. If you’re going to out Pierce on the All-Star team then Noah should be on the team as well
The biggest difference between this year and last
is that last year, when facing a depleted cellar-dwelling team, the Bulls would play down to their level and end up needing a 4th quarter push to win comfortably. This year they’re destroying teams right out the gate; giving more opportunity to rest Rose and others.
This should greatly help the fatigue factor come playoff time.
Dr. Handsome, D.D.S. - February 9, 2012
Yep, definitely a big difference between last year. Murder them by 20 instead of dragging it out into a 95-89 or 89-85 or 90-87 "too close for comfort" win
Locust_Inferno_666 - February 9, 2012
you would think
Except Thibs don’t rest anybody unless were up by 40 with a minute left
RM. - February 9, 2012 via mobile
This is true
but we probably don’t have our guys playing as hard as they used to have to.
Stacey_Is_King - February 9, 2012
derrick played only 22 min last night
so his attitude is changing
holla8283 - February 9, 2012
Does Orlando's success against Miami
mean that teams who chuck 3s relentlessly with one interior option can beat the Heat? So basically, start Rose, Korver, CJ, Rip and Deng. Let Omer set a pick, Rose penetrates (therefore being the ‘interior option’), kick out out, swing it around the perimeter and la-ti-da!
Winning. (also joking.)
Dr. Handsome, D.D.S. - February 9, 2012
Bugger, I originally had Omer in for Deng for pick setting purposes
and defense, but for some reason I forgot about the Luol Deng corner 3. And I forgot to get Omer’s part out of my post.
Dr. Handsome, D.D.S. - February 9, 2012
I don't think it means that
I think it means that teams with a ton of 3pt shooters can have good nights and score a ton of points. I think this bodes well for the Bulls when healthy. Hamilton and Deng are good shooters and Boozer is too. Rose should have room to work with and plenty of guys to kick to. Last night made pine even harder for Howard though. A lineup of Rose/Hamilton/Korver/Deng/Howard would absolutely destroy the Heat.
DRoseO1 - February 9, 2012
Yeah, all it means is that the people that don't want Howard are dummies
Juiceboxjerry - February 9, 2012
I sort of tried to make this
exact point on here before.
kingj41 - February 9, 2012
No, it just means you didn't watch the game.
Orlando’s shots were all the result of either Howard grabbing offensive rebounds or quality ball movement.
Ozzie Montana - February 9, 2012
that, and you live by the 3 die by the 3
orlando won’t shoot that well most nights and most nights would have gotten destroyed. dwight or no dwight
holla8283 - February 9, 2012
Yeah, they're pretty easy to figure out
When they’re hitting threes, they can beat pretty much anyone, but when they’re not, yikes. No creators, nothing in transition, no easy baskets, Hard to see them having a ton of success in the postseason with that formula. Maybe win a series, but they’ll eventually cool off
Juiceboxjerry - February 9, 2012
Actually it means I was joking.
You know…
Dr. Handsome, D.D.S. - February 9, 2012
A few years ago
Bulls also set an NBA record, 5 consecutive road wins over teams with a .500 record.
Trey23 - February 9, 2012
with Brad Miller!
your friendly BullsBlogger - February 9, 2012
Yup
that during the 2009-2010 season.
chicity773 - February 9, 2012
I have a headache
And im blaming lebron…Why? Because the world revolves around him apparently…(Refering to his response to Perkins)
T.Moore - February 9, 2012
ha
lol
piccolomair - February 9, 2012
Hmmm...
This really does seem to confirm the perception that Thibs resembles (some) football coaches when it comes to injuries.
You good to go, Derrick (or Rip, etc.)?
I’m ready, coach.
Case closed. He obviously can, and should play!
This really takes the cake. A player who has an injury that could easily be aggravated (e.g. groin, back, toe, etc.) is asked to play heavy minutes in blowouts because – seriously – if you sit that player, the next step would be for him to sit out the whole season?.
I really like Thibs as a coach, but this is an embarrassing response to very valid questions about injury management.
Really? And would Rip be exhibit A?
Sheesh.
Paul Warfield - February 9, 2012
I try not to listen to him when it comes to injuries
the actions are enough. I’m pleasantly surprised Rose only played 22 minutes last night. I’d rather he just sat, but still encouraging that Thibs actually used some tact. (apparently not so much with security blanket Deng)
your friendly BullsBlogger - February 9, 2012
lol @ this
from the daily dime on espn:
Jaina - February 9, 2012
That's just sad
I feel bad for their fans.
Fuck Stern.
tuluse - February 9, 2012
Yeah, in lieu of this, do you think that the vetoed trade was better or worse?
Conventional wisdom is that it is good to blow seasons and work the draft. I think this is stupid. You completely alienate your fan base. Look at Charlotte. Does anyone actually like that team? New Orleans could have been a middle of the pack team with the initial trade and at least presented a reasonable product for the money. Now they are simply a joke. If there is anything that is hurting league parity, it is this. I think that they should have some sort of control on how bad you can be. Maybe ship the worst teams to the D-league like they do in soccer.
THEKILLERWHALE - February 9, 2012
well, part of it is that the main trade piece they received
has been out except for like 2 games. i don’t think they’d be a great team with gordon, but they’d at least be a passable one.
Jaina - February 9, 2012
I still think Stern made the right play
I mean, Gordon’s had and injury history, but when healthy, he’s a great piece to start a rebuild with.
Actually, his injury could be a blessing in disguise (if he ever stops being injured). If they go on to lose at this rate, they should have a very high pick, and that would give them another nice piece to put next to Gordon. Then you add in Minnesota’s draft pick which they also got in the trade, which prob won’t be as high as previously thought, but still likely in the Lotto (imo), and you’re talking about a team that could be nicely stocked with young players next season.
I’d rather have all that than a middling team that would eventually have to tear down and rebuild in a few years anyway
Juiceboxjerry - February 9, 2012
Of course, if Gordon doesn't end up signing an extension with them
then it doesn’t look that good.
Dr. Handsome, D.D.S. - February 9, 2012
Yeah, but he's restricted, and the track record of teams re-signing guys on their first contract
when they want to retain them is really good.
Juiceboxjerry - February 9, 2012
Or an off-season
sign & trade for more “assets.”
kingj41 - February 9, 2012
Looking at the Wizards, I am very skeptical about rebuilding without veteran presence...
they have a few vets, but they are mainly a bunch of dumb kids. I think this may end up ruining careers as they never enter into a system in which they can self-actualize.
Look at the Spurs, they take mediocre talent and turn out quality players. A team with no veteran presence and no organizational identity takes heavy talent and spits out mediocrity. I think that this is the future of Charlotte, Washington and, now, New Orleans.
THEKILLERWHALE - February 9, 2012
Yeah, but the Wizards are kind of unique, in that, they keep bringing in complete doofuses
I don’t think they need vets as much as just smarter players. They’re banking on hitting on some high picks like Vesely, and whoever they bring in next year. I don’t think that’s a bad way to go.
Juiceboxjerry - February 9, 2012
They actually could be fantastic 2 years down the road
At their point in the draft, they could end up with one of Anthony Davis, Andre Drummond, or Jared Sullinger. Those are all solid big men. Around Minnesota’s pick, they could nab Austin Rivers (long shot, unless the TWolves start losing), or Jeff Taylor from Vandy (he could be instant scoring help). If they can get rid of Okafor some time before 2013 free agency, they will have a crap ton of cap room and lot’s of young talent.
A lineup of: Jack/Gordon/Taylor/Sullinger/Okafor could be pretty darn good. Get rid of Okafor before 2013 and bring in a solid C or PG, and they should be a dang good team. They might (I emphasize might) be able to snag Steph Curry from Golden state as they will have a ton of salary invested in Lee, Ellis, and Biedrins. If they don’t get rid of Ellis or Curry before then, they might not be able to match offers. Again, a ton of luck recquired here, but they could end up with a very good team without much effort.
DRoseO1 - February 9, 2012
My point is, even with these names, it is not clear that they will be a real basketball team.
If you do not have a strong organization and some kind of team continuity, it is very difficult to turn even top flight draft talent into a strong team. Washington has done everything right in the draft (according to the conventional wisdom) for the last two years, and there is no light at the end of the tunnel.
Is there one example of a team that has been completely blown up and then returned a high level of competition within a few years? The slow build is probably the wiser course. It may be difficult to nab that elusive superstar, but it is not impossible (1.7%!, Duncan, LA’s trade contortions to snag Kobe). Any thoughts?
THEKILLERWHALE - February 9, 2012
Belize - February 9, 2012
Look, you can't be pissed at Stern for vetoing a trade
that would have netted LESS than they received in the end. Either you hate him for tampering, which a lot of people thought was inethical and hypocritical, or you hate him for gutting the team with a stupid and insider-dealing trade. You can’t hate him for both. And most would agree the Hornets got great value for a star who was leaving regardless. It’s a sad situation, but nothing save for quality management would have made it better.
holla8283 - February 9, 2012
Stern still sucks. No matter how he handled that debacle.
In fact, it was a debacle when he stuck his nose in. Supposedly he is all about ‘parity’ in the league, yet for a long time he endorsed the Knicks and Lakers, especially when the Knicks were good, and anyway, where was he in July 2010 when Lebron ‘announced’ he was ‘taking his talents to South Beach??’ I guess the Heatles didn’t fudge pack themselves with enough all stars, hence Stern didn’t have any problems and didn’t veto the trade.
BullsFan22 - February 9, 2012
stern couldn't veto the trade because he wasn't an owner of either team.
thatshortkid - February 9, 2012
wait, it wasn't a trade. not sure how you veto free agent signings.
thatshortkid - February 9, 2012
I know, I was being excitedly sarcastic, lol.
BullsFan22 - February 9, 2012
so boozer lives with his mom?
Explains everything
Belize - February 9, 2012 via mobile
Rose fav movie is the notebook
and Brew can eat 20 hots dogs in one hour. NICE!
Geo4MVP - February 9, 2012
I wonder what else yfbb and Boozer have in common?
jpx7 - February 9, 2012
spray-on hair?
BULLieving in Miami - February 9, 2012 via mobile
and she doesn't clean up after him?
(bag joke)
SidM - February 9, 2012
is the Hornets mascot a Rubicks cube?
rocky_mountain_bull - February 9, 2012
It's puzzling.
Juiceboxjerry - February 9, 2012
yeah, I can't figure that one out either.
Fukudometer - February 9, 2012
I assumed that was an '80's Night' thing.
Bin Bin - February 9, 2012
yeah, I was gonna say, 80s night
cuz back in the day, Hornet was one of the cooler mascots
BULLieving in Miami - February 9, 2012 via mobile
How did Chris Paul take this team to the playoffs last year?
RoooR - February 9, 2012
He didn't.
Dr. Handsome, D.D.S. - February 9, 2012
They had Aaron Gray, then!
jpx7 - February 9, 2012
Aside from David West and the guys Paul was traded for it's virtually the same roster from last year.
Ozzie Montana - February 9, 2012
With David West being their leading scorer from a year ago
I think that makes a pretty big difference.
Dr. Handsome, D.D.S. - February 9, 2012
It would be like if Rose and Noah left the Bulls
Other than those two guys, it’s the same team.
tuluse - February 9, 2012
It's one player and he's not even a top 30 guy.
Ozzie Montana - February 9, 2012
What I don’t get is that, isn’t this basically what the Bulls are doing with Rip Hamilton right now? Thibs himself has said that he doesn’t wanna see Rip come in and out of the lineup, and that they wanna see him get fully healthy. Ok, so why doesn’t that also apply to the league MVP?
Juiceboxjerry - February 9, 2012
cuz rip is an old fart
so he has gives a lil more leeway to the elders
Belize - February 9, 2012
Because Rose can play effectively with his injuries,
while Rip can’t? And maybe they believe that Rose’s injury is what it is and won’t get worse while Rip’s obviously does get worse.
I’ll say this much, if Rose didn’t have a back issue, he’d have played his usual 37 minutes last night, even with his known toe problem. The reason is that the back actually prevents him from playing well and, the toe doesn’t.
Basically, Thibs is saying that he’s OK with playing his guys when they’re hurt, but not when they’re injured. That’s fine with me.
dakoose - February 9, 2012
can he?
First it is painfully obvious (pun intended) that Rose is not the same player with this back issue. He (understandably) plays in a restrained manner (did you notice when he didn’t even want to be involved in a break in last night’s game? He basically pulled himself up after crossing half-court.), and clearly lacks the explosiveness that we have come to expect.
True, but why play him at all? I agree that the toe is probably not going to get worse unless it takes a direct hit, but when he has been suffering from back problems for several games now, why play him at all against a team that they can beat handily without him? Is there really an argument that complete rest wouldn’t accelerate the healing process?
Paul Warfield - February 9, 2012
It's pretty impossible for any player to be effective when they have a back injury.
Scal might say otherwise, but I’m not sure…
BullsFan22 - February 9, 2012
Thats exactly what I said.
Thibs pulled him early because the back injury was clearly holding him back. The toe hasn’t, he was throwing down tomahawks against Boston his first game back after the toe thing.
dakoose - February 9, 2012
"Can you believe they thought I wanted that job?"
pb&j - February 9, 2012
BTW, Will Farrell was hilarious, I thought!! LOL
“Boozer still lives with his mom,” haha!!
BullsFan22 - February 9, 2012
i agree
People were hatin on it but that shit had me rolling just hearing will on the nba stage and the players looking real akward.
“He collects rare birds and has a pet dolphin named Chachi, Luol Deng” hahaha
RM. - February 9, 2012 via mobile
And about the Mexican dude not speaking English and they still 'loving him,' LOL
I bet nobody got the meaning of that.
BullsFan22 - February 9, 2012
Each factoid was so random I wonder if he even prepared or just improvised the whole thing on the spot.
The players seemed to like it and if you can make Thibs laugh before a game then you’ve done something right.
Ozzie Montana - February 9, 2012
Yeah, having watched the thing again on youtube (via Yahoo ball don't lie)
I am not sure why some thought that players didnt’ find it funny. I am sure there were one or two who weren’t as amused, but in general they seemed to enjoy it and were chuckling. Doing this once in a while is pretty cool and refreshing. We should get Bill Murray to do this at our home games, lol! Who is with me??
BullsFan22 - February 9, 2012
Boozer was specifically quoted as saying something to the effect of:
“Will Ferrell is one of the funniest dudes of our generation,” and, “We all love him,” so I’m not sure why anyone would get the impression that the players didn’t like it.
jpx7 - February 9, 2012
im with u
Belize - February 9, 2012
i think they were in 'game' mode
holla8283 - February 9, 2012
one of my fav parts is in the beginning when he says "your new orleans WHORE-Nets!"
but i dont think the commentators got that lol
Belize - February 9, 2012
It was chuckle worthy
lol
T.Moore - February 9, 2012
Chicago Bulls NBA BIG commercial
Highlights our team Defense:
http://www.thewindyapple.com/2012/02/09/chicago-bulls-nba-big-commercial/
ChiTownBallz - February 9, 2012
damn, thats awesome.
THEKILLERWHALE - February 9, 2012
That was pretty cool.
Stacey_Is_King - February 9, 2012
Did Scottie just give a nod/shout-out to CJ for the All Star Game??
That’s kinda cool!
BullsFan22 - February 9, 2012
3 point contest
my roommate said him and stacey are campaigning for him to be in the 3 point contest.
lindseyHuntersBackup - February 9, 2012
I don't think that'd go so well
He’s got a very slow release that seems to involve a lot of leg. Korver better be there this time though.
Poloplaya14 - February 9, 2012
By the way,
the caption for the photo is the best so far. Good shit Alex!
dakoose - February 9, 2012
i'm starting to feel less wary about playing time,
as thibs keeps mentioning that the practices are less than intense. i wonder if some aren’t even active practices and they just watch film.
obnoxious american - February 9, 2012
OT..
read this in a comment section, thought it was hilarious, so i had to post..just cuz:
Carmelo Anthony’s it up
stares at comment box
tells teammates to get away
fakes hitting several keys for almost 24 seconds
puts head fake on the other open windows
puts shoulder fake on monitor
ignores teammates yelling at me to submit comment
jab steps right with mouse
jabs steps left with mouse
dribbles mouse pad between my legs nohomo
steps back 23 feet from the keyboard
tries to submit comment while 3 people are surrounding me up jumping on my modem
gets wordpress message that my email and name are required and comment doesnt go through
tells reporters "MAYBE" its my fault my comment didnt go through, while blaming yfbb anyway
Belize - February 9, 2012
DENG!!
shutupdrogba - February 9, 2012
Great thing.
Playboy_BullV - February 9, 2012
Lu should
holla8283 - February 9, 2012
*ve been on it last year
an absolute crime that the second best defender in the eastern conference on the winningest team didn’t make it. but better this year than never!
holla8283 - February 9, 2012
it also should be noted
that the only player the guys from Inside the NBA did NOT say ‘well deserved’ to was Luol. None of them, besides for EJ, had him in their projected reserve list. Charles and Kenny had 2 Pacers, Shaq had Josh freaking Smith, and Webber was completely off the reservation with Ray Allen, Jrue Holiday and Josh Smith. So the best team by record in the NBA only deserves 1 All Star for the second year in a row? Are the Pacers more deserving?
Hopefully this gives the Bulls some added fire.
holla8283 - February 9, 2012
lol
yeah, they need more fire
your friendly BullsBlogger - February 9, 2012
you guys forgot passion.
obnoxious american - February 9, 2012
Go LUOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
K_yle33 - February 9, 2012
Luol is an All-Star!
About damn time!
UnBannedVikingholic - February 9, 2012
Luol is the man
I agree with Barkely about what he’s saying about Pierce getting in only because he’s played well for a couple of weeks. If you’re going to out Pierce on the All-Star team then Noah should be on the team as well
Dils - February 9, 2012
NEW THREAD, YAY LUOL
http://www.blogabull.com/2012/2/9/2788164/luol-deng-named-to-2012-all-star-team
your friendly BullsBlogger - February 9, 2012
lu deng = most underrated player in nba
I could speak for days on that but I’m sure everyone on this site already knows
RM. - February 9, 2012 via mobile
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Blog a Bull to post a comment.