Beasley's on my fantasy team and in a little nugget I saw while looking at his player page I saw this:
The Lakers and Minnesota have talked about a trade that would send Beasley to Los Angeles, ESPN's Chris Broussard reports. Beasley scored 17 points with seven rebounds in 33 minutes in Monday's loss to Denver.
The report says the Lakers would likely give up a second-round pick or cash.

When you're a team at the top like the Bulls are and you're going to be drafting 28-30th in the draft for the foreseeable future(Charlotte's pick is still years away), you need to be creative when looking at ways to improve your team. And when a low-risk high-reward situation like this presents itself, I don't see how you can turn it down.
Minnesota has a minutes issue at the forward spots: Kevin Love is the main guy and will be taking up damn near all the minutes at the 4 and the team just invested a high lottery pick in Derrick Williams, who's probably their future at the 3. And if it's not him, it's Wesley Johnson. Right now, Beasley's better than either one, but the T-Wolves are not about the now, they're looking down the road and if they can unload Beasley and pick up a draft pick, they'd probably do it now that he's on the bench after being injured early on.
So why would the Bulls do this? For several reasons:
1) If the Bulls do intend to make a splash and go after Dwight Howard, they will need to part with Lieutenant Deng. Now, Beasley's not the defender Deng is, but he's a much more gifted scorer and though the defense at the 3 might suffer, you plug in a really capable scorer who can get his own shot and you have Dwight under the basket, which offsets any loss of defense and then some.
2) Even if they do not go after Dwight, why not throw our really late first rounder at Minnesota for Beasley? He's a little big for the position, but I'd give him minutes at the 2 next to Derrick, moving Ronnie back to the bench mob while Rip is out. If Beasley works out, you worry about fitting Rip back into things later and perhaps hive him some time with Derrick and some time with the bench mob and bury Kyle or Ronnie further down the bench. Beasley has the potential to be the backcourt/swingman scorer to plug in with Derrick to give this team a big-time scoring punch for the next 7-8 years.
Even if Beasley doesn't become a capable defender under Thibs, which is a big possibility, he's still a super-useful scorer off of the bench and can start for you in a pinch. People here were clamoring for JR Smith, I don't see why Beasley isn't a better option. He's got far more upside and has been a 20ppg scorer as recently as last season while miscast as a #1 scoring option.
If he doesn't work out here.......kiss his ass goodbye and all you're out on is a pick which you could probably buy from another team for a million bucks or two. I look at this as a once-in-a-while situation to acquire a big talent for a bargain price, much like Memphis did with Zach Randolph a couple of years ago. I really, really like the idea of Beasley as a second or third scoring option under the tutelage of Tom Thibodeau. What do y'all think of going after this kid?
FanPosts are user-created posts from the BlogABull community, and are to be treated as the opinions and views of that particular user, not that of the blogger or blog community as a whole.
0 recs | 50 comments
I think you meant ...
Time to Get Desperate: Trading for Michael Beasley.
Option27 - February 21, 2012
this
horrible idea don’t want this guy anywhere near this team im sorry i’d look elsewhere for scoring options..
ChicagoStyle - February 23, 2012
Where you gonna get a scorer by giving up virtually nobody?
If you think this Bulls FO is the type to really shake things up, you and I are talking about different teams.
dakoose - February 23, 2012
a shitty idea
kpd - February 21, 2012
I think the big question for the org is
How would this affect our flexibility and team chemistry going forward?
ChiTownSportsMaster - February 21, 2012
Beasley's PER has gotten lower every single year
tuluse - February 21, 2012
I tried to read
Then had to stop when he suggested playing Beasley at the 2.
ddub101 - February 21, 2012
Exactly once he suggested Beasley at the 2…my mind shut off. Beasley can’t even guard 3s…how’s he gonna fuck with 2s
C Smoove - February 21, 2012
Beasley's been pretty awful this year
He’s regressed across the board, and at this point, calling him a “capable scorer who can create his own shot” isn’t really justified. Throw in his awful defense, and now you know why the asking price is only a 2nd-rounder + cash.
Poloplaya14 - February 21, 2012
For reference, compare these two players' stat lines this year
Player A: 17.3 points/36 min, .424 FG%, .426 3pt%, .486 TS%, 24.9 USG%
Player B: 17.1 points/36 min, .390 FG%, .417 3pt%, .481 TS%, 25.5 USG%
Player A is Michael Beasley. Player B is John Lucas the Third.
Poloplaya14 - February 21, 2012
So, what you're saying is
We should lock JLIII down as soon as possible?
jpx7 - February 21, 2012
But we already used our max deal on DRose!
Hopefully he does not start clamoring for a trade to a team in a warmer climate.
THEKILLERWHALE - February 21, 2012
if its for a pick, y not i guess
somebody gotta buy noah’s shwag anyway
Belize - February 21, 2012
"somebody gotta buy noah’s shwag anyway"
Beat me to it.
jpx7 - February 21, 2012
you didn't mention anyone the Bulls are giving up
the Lakers only need to offer that because they have a giant trade exception from dealing Odom.
your friendly BullsBlogger - February 21, 2012
Didn't realize Beasley was making as much as he did,
they would have to do Lucas/Korver for Beasley. I’d still do it, but I think more highly of Beasley than most here do.
dakoose - February 21, 2012
he wouldnt be a bad option off the bench. I agree, maybe hes a 6th man option bulls can consider?
Geo4MVP - February 21, 2012
he would be great if we could get him for cheap
He can score the ball in an ISO situation which is great for us. If lebron guards rose and wade guards deng who guards Beasley? Barrier maybe? But then you have Chalmers on rip.
Rose-Hamilton-deng-Beasley-Noah for like 5 minutes a game would TORCH teams. Plus he’s no worse than Booze defensively.
MartyMondays - February 21, 2012 via mobile
It's not clear to me that he would be better to have than Korver
Because that’s who he would effectively be replacing.
hitlesswonder - February 21, 2012
you mean Battier*...Not Barrier
T.Moore - February 22, 2012
Idk why people seem so down on the idea
I like it if he’s willing to come off the bench. I’m tiring of the Brewer/Korver experiment. We need a legit bench scoring threat. Plus I’d be very interested what kind of work Thibs could do with Beasley. I don’t care if his stats have declined, he’s a talented player. If you put him in the right environment, with the right coach, in the right role, he could flourish.
All that being said, he seems like a VERY immature guy. He doesn’t seem like a bad person, but just kinda dumb, and careless. And I’m not sure that’s someone you want to bring in at the moment. It might be the type of move you make AFTER this season to switch things up, if the current squad can’t get the job done
Juiceboxjerry - February 21, 2012
That's all I'm saying here.
There will not be any no-brainers for the Bulls to pull off that can vastly improve the team; if they want to take another step forwards they will have to get creative and try some moves. This is a low-cost, low-risk move that can pay off enormous dividends if it works out. If it doesn’t…..you didn’t lose much.
dakoose - February 21, 2012
He seems like a bad basketball player above anything else.
Ozzie Montana - February 22, 2012
exactly, ive never heard of Beasley being some toxic player who ruins teams
He’s just a little hardheaded, surround him with good coaches, good leaders like Rose and Rip, and a winning situation in Chicago?
I really think he would realise the opportunity and provide a legit threat as our 6th man. CJ,Butler, Beasley, Taj, Asik. Sounds better than our current bench mob.
MartyMondays - February 22, 2012 via mobile
People are down on the idea because he is not all that good at basketball
If we could simply trade an exception for him, it becomes a win-win situation, where if he fits, we can use him, but if not there is no harm done. However, we have to give up pieces that are part of the successful system currently in place.
Since his rookie season, his PER is down, his TS% is way down, his rebound rates are down (although he does play with Love), his 3pt% is his only redeeming quality. I guess maybe giving up KK for him is not the worst idea since he is not a great defender and just gets threes anyhow, but even then, at least KK knowos the system. I’d be worried about making any trade for a guy that was not for sure a game changer. Picking up free agents or trading nothing for something on the other hand, is another story.
DRoseO1 - February 22, 2012
Beasley
is a better player than Brewer or Korver. If we can get him easily, we should.
MartyMondays - February 22, 2012
Two things
One, you give no argument for this. Just because a guy was drafted number 2, doesn’t make him good. Furthermore, better at offense? Certainly. Better at defense? Pishh. Furthermore, they don’t even play the same positions! Beasley is splitting time between the SF and PF pretty evenly. Korver is a SG/SF and Brewer has played mostly SG. If we get rid of these players, who the hell is going to play 2 guard?
DRoseO1 - February 22, 2012
Rip
rick o'shay - February 22, 2012
I more meant backup SG
And, with Rip injured…
DRoseO1 - February 22, 2012
jimmy butler / cj watson
Hell even deng can play the 2. We were looking into guys like Tayshawn Prince to play the 3 with deng at 2.
Backup wing players are a dime a dozen, 6-10 combo forwards with ISO skills and 3pt range are not. To have him as a 6th man would give us a totally different angle.
MartyMondays - February 23, 2012 via mobile
6-10 combo forwards with ISO skills and 3pt range
When did Lamar Odom become available?
kingj41 - February 23, 2012
lol good point
Odom = way better passer
Beasley = reasonably better scorer
MartyMondays - February 23, 2012
Furthermore
Beasley’s PER is 13.2 with 25 USG%. Brewer is a 12.1 PER with 15 USG% and Korver is a 12.6 PER with a 14.4 USG%. Let’s put this in some perspective. If Beasley kept up this pace for an entire season (60+ games with over 20 minutes played per game), he would be at a tie for the 24th worst season with greater than 24 USG%. To summarize, Beasley is not good.
DRoseO1 - February 22, 2012
i would never trade something i thought was extremely important for Beasley
but if it’s like a 2nd round pick and brewer or korver… it just makes sense. Beasley gives us one thing we are missing, he can get his own shot. He’s not the greatest at it but he possesses the skill. Brewer is a liability on offense and Korver has proven he can’t get a good shot against an athletic defense.
MartyMondays - February 23, 2012
Basically
if we’re playing the Heat and our offense is DEAD, i have more faith in putting Beasley out there than Brewer.
MartyMondays - February 23, 2012
If we're playing the Heat
And we’re relying on either Brewer or Beasley to create offense, we’re most likely dead.
tuluse - February 24, 2012
dead?
Belize - February 24, 2012
i don't think at the beginning of last year
you would have said, “man i have a feeling JJ Barea is going to be a MAJOR contributor to a championship team this year!” but shit happens. You need weapons and even though Beasley is a jackass he’s more likely to have an impact on a team that needs offensive firepower, than brewer or korver.
MartyMondays - February 24, 2012
The effect that Barea had on that series is highly overrated
Barea had one good game against Miami and 4 bad ones.
Poloplaya14 - February 26, 2012
Sorry 2 good games and 4 bad ones
Poloplaya14 - February 26, 2012
It's not weather he played well or not
he gave them something they didn’t have, dribble penetration. Players just by being in the game have a certain effect, even when Korver doesn’t make shots he opens up the game for instance.
The effect a player has on a game goes a lot further than weather they had a good or bad game, Beasley would give the Bulls something they don’t have.
MartyMondays - February 26, 2012
"Beasley would give the Bulls something they don’t have."
Yes, and that something is a lazy bum with a bad attitude.
Poloplaya14 - February 26, 2012
lol alright man
MartyMondays - February 27, 2012
13+ ppg
on 50% shooting and 5 assists once he was inserted into the starting lineup, starting with game 4. They went on to win game 4, and the next 2.
Before he was inserted into the starting lineup, he was virtually ineffective. ; scoring just 13 points TOTAL, while shooting 28% from the field.
chicity773 - February 27, 2012
I stopped reading when u said get rid of deng for beasley
sweetneyisfat - February 21, 2012
Well then you didn't read
because he said you would trade Deng for Howard
TheFunkle - February 22, 2012
which I should clarify
you would be a moron not to do. I love Deng. But Howard is just…….. Howard
TheFunkle - February 22, 2012
Then you stopped reading before you started,
because like TheFunkle said, I never said that. I said that if you include Deng in a deal for Howard, you supplement that with dealing for Beasley.
dakoose - February 22, 2012
There's a reason Miami traded Beasley for almost nothing when they were desperate for pieces to surround the big 3
It’s because Beasley is a potential cancer to a team. Do we really want a guy like that? The fact that Minnesota is willing to trade him should speak volumes as well. If a rebuilding team doesn’t want a young talent, he has to be a total headcase.
Do you really think Beasley would react well to Thibs too? Thibs isn’t going to play him and he’d probably be in the doghouse for his horrendous D and selfish offense.
Beas is probably in the top 10 players I would not want to see the Bulls trade for.
TheHungarianJordan - February 22, 2012
no, they traded him because they wanted to clear as much space as possible for lebron/bosh
not because of him being a potential cancer.
that being said, i’m not really interested.
Jaina - February 22, 2012
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Blog a Bull to post a comment.