SB Nation - Login for mobile commenting

Blog a Bull

Bulls vs. Sixers: Injury-induced shorter rotations diminishing Bulls aggressiveness

The Bulls' 17 turnovers in Wednesday's 16-point beating at the hands of the 76ers were certainly the devastating factor that Philly exploited for a gap-widening 29 points. But the Bulls were also out-rebounded 43-37, accumulating only eight on the offensive end where they bricked 42 shots from the field for a season-low 20% offensive rebounding rate (ORR/ORB%), according to Hoopdata.

The Bulls themselves won't make excuses, but they're a team that wins with energy, hustle, aggressiveness, blah, blah, blah -- basically extensions of their speed, size, alertness, I.Q., and the knowledge acquired through scouting before the game. The injuries to Luol Deng and Richard Hamilton are forcing extended shifts on the lesser-skilled Ronnie Brewer and Kyle Korver, shrinking those reserves' margin of error, demanding more push from the entire rotation, and the wears are showing some tears.

Tom Thibodeau called the Bulls "sluggish" after the blowout, adding: "They [the Sixers] came out with a lot of aggressiveness. We got back on our heels... Our reaction was very poor. They beat us to loose balls, second-effort plays."

The Bulls came out of halftime looking absolutely awful. Their six turnovers into 13 points in the third quarter played a huge role in the Sixers lighting them up for separate 11-1 and 13-5 runs. The Bulls just added to the mess, grabbing only two offensive boards on 13 bricks and dropping an egg on points in the paint, while Philly grabbed four offensive boards on 15 misses, getting out-rebounded 14-9 in the quarter of a game where they were out-rebounded by four [.pdf].

Sure, the turnovers put the Sixers over the top, but it's one thing to turn the ball over being sloppy and another to get caught napping on loose balls of all sorts. It's one thing for opponents to convert forced turnovers into fastbreak points and another to have opponents' halfcourt possessions constantly never challenged by second-efforts -- let alone lacking the third-efforts to prevent basket cutting and recovering to close out on shooters.

Star-divide

Through Wednesday's games, the team which committed more turnovers is 111-190 (36.9%) this season and the team that's been out-rebounded is 103-207 (33.2%).

The Bulls are 8-4 (67%) this year when their turnover rate (TOV%) is higher than that they force on opponents, but they're 5-3 (62.5%) when they're in the red in ORB% differential. They've been on the wrong side of those factors in three straight games, losing two -- but the one win was against the Wizards, so, well, you know.

The fact of the matter is that data from this season's NBA reflects that sloppiness is up and energy is down across the league. According to Basketball-Reference.com, FG% is down to .443 from .459 (3.5% drop), FT% is down to .745 from .763 (2.4% drop), and scoring is down to 102.6 points per 100 possessions (ORtg) from 107.3 (4.4% drop). And even with Pace Factor only slightly down to 91.5 from 92.1 (0.7% drop), "pace" is a reflection of possessions per team per 48 minutes and the factors which add possessions to games are up -- TOV% is way up to .143 from .134 (6.7% rise) while this year's defensive rebounding rate (.737 DRB%) is about the same as last season's .736.

The Bulls themselves are up to fifth this season in ORtg from 11th last season, but slightly down to 107.2 from 108.3 (1% drop), about the same in TOV%, way up in ORB% to .315 from .294 (7.1% rise), but down to a league-average .734 in DRB% from last season's second-best .762 (3.7% drop). The volatility of swings in turnover differential are just going to be the state of the league this year and the Bulls are definitely well on the right side of average in that category, but inconsistent rebounding on the defensive end elongates their opponents' possessions, wasting their own successful efforts at forcing bricks, and kills more opportunities for them to catch opponents napping in transition.

Sure, the Bulls lost in Philly -- to a 16-6 team with a league-best 94.0 DRtg, allowing only an absolutely ridiculous 81.3 PPG at home primarily -- because of turnovers. But the Bulls have proven time and time-again that their aggressiveness on the glass creates blowouts when other numbers suggest otherwise, holds difficult leads when other aspects of the game are lacking, and can always keep opponents within striking distance when they themselves are getting outplayed.

The injuries to this team will slow down the hurt players here and there. But when they're not there, the shrinking rotation more unevenly distributes the burden -- and threatens the energy necessary for the Bulls to win games.

All of that said, they're an East-best 18-6. Let's have a party.

But, yeah, since starting the 2010-11 season 11-18 in their first 29 games that included the Bulls kicking them around for a 45-point slaughterfest, the Sixers are 46-29 with three straight wins over the Bulls. They're The Truth.

2 recs  |  60 comments

Comments

so the sixers are better, then?
No.

If you want to direct a corollary point with my post on the Heat, go for it. Or did you not read the post and just instantly comment?

was referencing the last one.
"Truth" as in top-class in the East?

No, talent still matters. Gritty, grindiness, energy, and depth accumulate regular season wins. When you put up the guys needed to play 35-40 minutes, as rotations shrink in the playoffs, Sixers are effectively a top-four team, meaning they should win a playoff series and make the second round series they lose fun to watch hope-killers for any propective non-division-winning playoff teams.

honestly i think the pacers might be more talented.
I don't know...

I’m really high on Iggy, Hawes, and Thad. I guess I’m thinking this way: hypothetically, put a top 20 player on the Sixers and the Pacers, who’s better? I think the Sixers, but it’s close. Why I said top four.

That said, put a point guard on the Knicks and give ‘em a coach, that’s a crazy top five. The Knicks, Cs, and Hawks have a lot of downside, but when each of them are on — which can happen in any playoff series — I think they threaten the Pacers more than the Sixers.

Well..

It seems that you should know. If the Sixers require a top 20 player to be in a “close” discusssion as to maybe being better than the Pacers… wouldn’t that make the Pacers better as they stand now?

If you put a top 20 player anywhere it’s going to make a difference… Hell, if we’re just handing them out – how about sending another to Chicago?

Put a PG and a coach on the Knicks and they become better? Profound.

Put a set of balls on your auntie and she’s your uncle.

Wow.

I guess there’s something to be said about reading closely.

You said on the Pacers AND the Sixers… Didn’t see that. Can I blame macular degeneration?

I’ll go kill myself now.

Yeah, but doesn't that make them particularly suited to beat us?

Because even though we have a top 5 player, we also rely on depth, and overwhelming people with energy and bodies.

The Sixers are a good team, but they’re a gimmick. There’s just only so far you can go with their setup. They aren’t coming out of the East. That being said, they do scare me when it comes to our Bulls.

Also, that's relative....

I figured too many things went right at the same time for last year’s second-half success to be repeatable, so maybe it’s just a reflection of me being late to the party.

No

But closer to contemporaries than expected. The bulls can dispatch of weaker teams even with injury problems. Sixers are solid.

if we don't have Rip and Deng on the roster, then yes.
Kevin Love speaks the truth
K Love should be liked here now
I'm ok with that picture being used often
For a second I thought the post was duplicated
Since when is Granger a tough guy?

Granger of all people..

The Sixers are 7-1 in games Chapu plays.

FYI, didn’t play last night. Wasn’t necessary.

I found your true identity

https://twitter.com/#!/McGrawDHBulls/status/164877679944941569

If only...

I wish I was a sportswriter so I could reference Andres Nocioni’s toughness on every story I ever wrote. You know, like Whitlock and The Wire.

pic-swagger jacker alert
I'm in love with Love.

“I’ve said all along,” Love said, “I don’t like the Pacers.”

“I know that none of them were going to do anything,” said Love, who finished with 21 points. “Just play ball. It’s part of the game — a hard foul, everybody is getting fouled out there.”

“(They think) they are so tough,” Love said. “They take those pills and they got all that toughness. I don’t know where that comes from. They all think they are tough guys. I just don’t know where that comes from. It just blows my mind. They are all tough and that makes me laugh.”

“I guarantee the next time we play them, it will be just as physical,” he said.

KLove>Dwight Howard now?

Booz, Noah, Brew, and Charlotte pick for KLove?

/sarcasm

That wouldn't be a bad deal, to be honest.

You end up with a great starting lineup and keep a lot of the bench strength.

Start DRose/Rip/Lu/Love/Omer, bring in CJ/KK/Butler/Taj off the bench. Pile up wins and have a better chance at beating Miami than you do now, most likely.

You have the best pick and roll/pop in the league with Rose and KLove, you win the battle on the glass every night and you have seriously amazing spacing on offense with Love and Lu out there. If you’re facing a team without much of a threat at the 2, you can even start Kyle, keep the lane wide open by having Love, Deng and KK hang at the perimeter and watch DRose knock in layup after layup.

Nah, I think that's waaaaay too much for someone as unproven as KLove.

I really like the guy, and he’s a GREAT player, don’t get me wrong, but I’d be uneasy over the fact that his team still isn’t very good.

Well, you'd have to get into my mind a little bit here to really understand why I'd do the deal.

Let’s make it clear; I think Carlos Boozer is a stinkfest and he doesn’t help this team win, so I’d be glad to get him off this team in any capacity. With Joakim, he’s good, but I don’t think there’s a huge gap in production between him and Jomer. Jo is better, but basically with this deal I’m giving up Boozer, who I’m glad to get rid of, and then giving away Noah, Brewer and a three-years-down-the-road pick for a guy who’s a great compliment to DRose.

Brewer’s nice, but I think Butler can give you some of what Brewer does and within a year or two he’ll probably be just as good.

While I have a totally different opinion on Boozer...

I don’t know if I would do it even if it was for Noah, Brew, the pick, and Taj. The offensive dropoff between Jo and Omer is that big IMO.

...I wouldn't do that for Love...Dwight sure

But Love?

replace noah with taj

gogogogogo

Did we just LOSE to the SIXERS by 16(!!!!!!!!!!!) pts??

Oh wait, 3/4 of the team is injured and the Sixers are actually good this year. Still sucks to lost by 16 pts!

That justifies my KLove tshirt purchase last year.
Why are people so in love with what kevin said but feel like derrick should STFU and not voice his opinion.

smh

If Derrick came out and said

“I hate Indiana and they’re a bunch of fake ass tough-guys,” I wouldn’t have a problem with it, especially after the hard fouls he’s taken from them. But he came out after losing and was salty about their celebrating. Well….if you don’t want them to celebrate, win the damn game for your team. Don’t pass to Scalibrine for the game winning shot.

not to mention

with Kevin Love, he probably saying it with some actual emotion and feeling behind it. He probably REALLY DOES hate them. When Rose says stuff, it just comes off as mechanical, robotic, and with not much emotion. Not that he didn’t mean it, but it would be harder to believe it. If they both said the same thing, I would believe it more out of Love’s mouth.

Kevin Love sucks. He is getting good stats, but they are mostly padded because he plays for MN.

I mean, think about it, what have T-Wolves since Kevin “Bar Fight” Garnett left town? Exactly. Next.

But but

Rubio! NEXT STEVE NASH!!!

He doesn't suck, at all.

He’s just not good enough to carry a team to anywhere that matters. As your second option he’s fantastic.

right...

he “sucks”. Be sure to note that insight on your application to become an NBA scout (or ball boy, as the case may be).

Who told Derrick to stfu after that?

Personally I don’t think he even realizes that what he says is gonna be a big deal. It’s guys like KC that are in the Derrick Rose myth making business that lets these things get carried away.

He was probably just sitting there all pissed off, and the media started talking and he was being honest that he couldn’t believe they were celebrating like that. He’s not like Kobe where he’s super aware and always trying to build himself up

seriously..thaqt booz pic looks like he's screaming for a high 5 gone wrong

You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Blog a Bull to post a comment.