The Bulls' 17 turnovers in Wednesday's 16-point beating at the hands of the 76ers were certainly the devastating factor that Philly exploited for a gap-widening 29 points. But the Bulls were also out-rebounded 43-37, accumulating only eight on the offensive end where they bricked 42 shots from the field for a season-low 20% offensive rebounding rate (ORR/ORB%), according to Hoopdata.
The Bulls themselves won't make excuses, but they're a team that wins with energy, hustle, aggressiveness, blah, blah, blah -- basically extensions of their speed, size, alertness, I.Q., and the knowledge acquired through scouting before the game. The injuries to Luol Deng and Richard Hamilton are forcing extended shifts on the lesser-skilled Ronnie Brewer and Kyle Korver, shrinking those reserves' margin of error, demanding more push from the entire rotation, and the wears are showing some tears.
Tom Thibodeau called the Bulls "sluggish" after the blowout, adding: "They [the Sixers] came out with a lot of aggressiveness. We got back on our heels... Our reaction was very poor. They beat us to loose balls, second-effort plays."
The Bulls came out of halftime looking absolutely awful. Their six turnovers into 13 points in the third quarter played a huge role in the Sixers lighting them up for separate 11-1 and 13-5 runs. The Bulls just added to the mess, grabbing only two offensive boards on 13 bricks and dropping an egg on points in the paint, while Philly grabbed four offensive boards on 15 misses, getting out-rebounded 14-9 in the quarter of a game where they were out-rebounded by four [.pdf].
Sure, the turnovers put the Sixers over the top, but it's one thing to turn the ball over being sloppy and another to get caught napping on loose balls of all sorts. It's one thing for opponents to convert forced turnovers into fastbreak points and another to have opponents' halfcourt possessions constantly never challenged by second-efforts -- let alone lacking the third-efforts to prevent basket cutting and recovering to close out on shooters.

Through Wednesday's games, the team which committed more turnovers is 111-190 (36.9%) this season and the team that's been out-rebounded is 103-207 (33.2%).
The Bulls are 8-4 (67%) this year when their turnover rate (TOV%) is higher than that they force on opponents, but they're 5-3 (62.5%) when they're in the red in ORB% differential. They've been on the wrong side of those factors in three straight games, losing two -- but the one win was against the Wizards, so, well, you know.
The fact of the matter is that data from this season's NBA reflects that sloppiness is up and energy is down across the league. According to Basketball-Reference.com, FG% is down to .443 from .459 (3.5% drop), FT% is down to .745 from .763 (2.4% drop), and scoring is down to 102.6 points per 100 possessions (ORtg) from 107.3 (4.4% drop). And even with Pace Factor only slightly down to 91.5 from 92.1 (0.7% drop), "pace" is a reflection of possessions per team per 48 minutes and the factors which add possessions to games are up -- TOV% is way up to .143 from .134 (6.7% rise) while this year's defensive rebounding rate (.737 DRB%) is about the same as last season's .736.
The Bulls themselves are up to fifth this season in ORtg from 11th last season, but slightly down to 107.2 from 108.3 (1% drop), about the same in TOV%, way up in ORB% to .315 from .294 (7.1% rise), but down to a league-average .734 in DRB% from last season's second-best .762 (3.7% drop). The volatility of swings in turnover differential are just going to be the state of the league this year and the Bulls are definitely well on the right side of average in that category, but inconsistent rebounding on the defensive end elongates their opponents' possessions, wasting their own successful efforts at forcing bricks, and kills more opportunities for them to catch opponents napping in transition.
Sure, the Bulls lost in Philly -- to a 16-6 team with a league-best 94.0 DRtg, allowing only an absolutely ridiculous 81.3 PPG at home primarily -- because of turnovers. But the Bulls have proven time and time-again that their aggressiveness on the glass creates blowouts when other numbers suggest otherwise, holds difficult leads when other aspects of the game are lacking, and can always keep opponents within striking distance when they themselves are getting outplayed.
The injuries to this team will slow down the hurt players here and there. But when they're not there, the shrinking rotation more unevenly distributes the burden -- and threatens the energy necessary for the Bulls to win games.
All of that said, they're an East-best 18-6. Let's have a party.
But, yeah, since starting the 2010-11 season 11-18 in their first 29 games that included the Bulls kicking them around for a 45-point slaughterfest, the Sixers are 46-29 with three straight wins over the Bulls. They're The Truth.
2 recs | 60 comments
so the sixers are better, then?
obnoxious american - February 2, 2012
No.
If you want to direct a corollary point with my post on the Heat, go for it. Or did you not read the post and just instantly comment?
Alex Sonty - February 2, 2012
was referencing the last one.
obnoxious american - February 2, 2012
"Truth" as in top-class in the East?
No, talent still matters. Gritty, grindiness, energy, and depth accumulate regular season wins. When you put up the guys needed to play 35-40 minutes, as rotations shrink in the playoffs, Sixers are effectively a top-four team, meaning they should win a playoff series and make the second round series they lose fun to watch hope-killers for any propective non-division-winning playoff teams.
Alex Sonty - February 2, 2012
honestly i think the pacers might be more talented.
obnoxious american - February 2, 2012
I don't know...
I’m really high on Iggy, Hawes, and Thad. I guess I’m thinking this way: hypothetically, put a top 20 player on the Sixers and the Pacers, who’s better? I think the Sixers, but it’s close. Why I said top four.
That said, put a point guard on the Knicks and give ‘em a coach, that’s a crazy top five. The Knicks, Cs, and Hawks have a lot of downside, but when each of them are on — which can happen in any playoff series — I think they threaten the Pacers more than the Sixers.
Alex Sonty - February 2, 2012
Well..
It seems that you should know. If the Sixers require a top 20 player to be in a “close” discusssion as to maybe being better than the Pacers… wouldn’t that make the Pacers better as they stand now?
If you put a top 20 player anywhere it’s going to make a difference… Hell, if we’re just handing them out – how about sending another to Chicago?
Put a PG and a coach on the Knicks and they become better? Profound.
Put a set of balls on your auntie and she’s your uncle.
Johannes Factotum - February 2, 2012
Wow.
I guess there’s something to be said about reading closely.
You said on the Pacers AND the Sixers… Didn’t see that. Can I blame macular degeneration?
I’ll go kill myself now.
Johannes Factotum - February 2, 2012
lulz
obnoxious american - February 2, 2012
Yeah, but doesn't that make them particularly suited to beat us?
Because even though we have a top 5 player, we also rely on depth, and overwhelming people with energy and bodies.
The Sixers are a good team, but they’re a gimmick. There’s just only so far you can go with their setup. They aren’t coming out of the East. That being said, they do scare me when it comes to our Bulls.
Juiceboxjerry - February 2, 2012
Also, that's relative....
I figured too many things went right at the same time for last year’s second-half success to be repeatable, so maybe it’s just a reflection of me being late to the party.
Alex Sonty - February 2, 2012
No
But closer to contemporaries than expected. The bulls can dispatch of weaker teams even with injury problems. Sixers are solid.
DRoseO1 - February 2, 2012 via Android app
if we don't have Rip and Deng on the roster, then yes.
illwill - February 2, 2012 via iPhone app
Kevin Love speaks the truth
jrobulls - February 2, 2012
K Love should be liked here now
T.Moore - February 2, 2012
I'm ok with that picture being used often
your friendly BullsBlogger - February 2, 2012
For a second I thought the post was duplicated
JustAnotherFan - February 2, 2012
Since when is Granger a tough guy?
Granger of all people..
T.Moore - February 2, 2012
Haha
T.Moore - February 2, 2012
pills??
obnoxious american - February 2, 2012
Yeah, I don't get that either...
Do we have to get Bob Ley on this one?
Juiceboxjerry - February 2, 2012
the last remnant of respectability at espn.
obnoxious american - February 2, 2012
Maybe just a weird way to say they fake toughness?
As if they think they can just pop a pill and somehow become tough?
dakoose - February 2, 2012
or you can pop in a real pill
steroids, and become tough, and big headed…..
piccolomair - February 2, 2012
And
small headed at the same time.
Cannoli - February 2, 2012
Fail.
Anabolid steroids can atrophy your balls, but they don’t have any effect on the dick.
dakoose - February 2, 2012
Fail???? Back to School for You
Anabolic steroids don’t “shrink” anything, technically. They lower testosterone count, which not only lessens the size of your testicles, but often results in erectile dysfunction. Soft dick=smaller head. And you apparently missed the point of my post. But otherwise, thanks for sharing.
Cannoli - February 3, 2012
Foster people's elbows Deng and all of a sudden they're tough guys now
It reminds me of when Brandon Marshall said Joey Porter had popcorn muscles
pb&j - February 2, 2012
The Sixers are 7-1 in games Chapu plays.
FYI, didn’t play last night. Wasn’t necessary.
chapuforyou - February 2, 2012
I found your true identity
https://twitter.com/#!/McGrawDHBulls/status/164877679944941569
your friendly BullsBlogger - February 2, 2012
If only...
I wish I was a sportswriter so I could reference Andres Nocioni’s toughness on every story I ever wrote. You know, like Whitlock and The Wire.
chapuforyou - February 2, 2012
pic-swagger jacker alert
Belize - February 2, 2012 via mobile
I'm in love with Love.
“I’ve said all along,” Love said, “I don’t like the Pacers.”
“I know that none of them were going to do anything,” said Love, who finished with 21 points. “Just play ball. It’s part of the game — a hard foul, everybody is getting fouled out there.”
“(They think) they are so tough,” Love said. “They take those pills and they got all that toughness. I don’t know where that comes from. They all think they are tough guys. I just don’t know where that comes from. It just blows my mind. They are all tough and that makes me laugh.”
“I guarantee the next time we play them, it will be just as physical,” he said.
dakoose - February 2, 2012
I'm officially done calling Kevin Love overrated
That Pacers team is like one big group of delusional retards, and their coach is the delusional retard king. When the fuck did Danny Granger become a tough guy?
Juiceboxjerry - February 2, 2012
Lol, I still think he's overrated, but only because Chuck thinks he's the best PF in the game.
He’s not good enough to be a #1 guy on a championship team but he’s a little too good to be looked at as a side-kick. He’s somewhere between a 1 and a 2.
dakoose - February 2, 2012
Yeah
He’s not overrated, he’s just differently-awesome kind of.
Prevenge - February 2, 2012
Le Bron
is the best power forward in the game. No one else is close.
Cannoli - February 2, 2012
Um he's a Small Forward
What are you talking about?
T.Moore - February 2, 2012
Yeah, my thoughts exactly.
dakoose - February 2, 2012
And for you, my friend
you have the best name on the site. Stop it with these thoughtless comments. In the words of the immortal Mark Jackson, “You’re better than that.”
Cannoli - February 3, 2012
Um
What position does he play when Miami uses Bosh at center and Mile Miller at SF. He plays the 4 in many Miami schemes. If he were on the Bulls, would you replace Deng or Boozer? There isn’t a team in basketball that wouldn’t trade their four for Le Bron. He often plays point guard, as well. Again, you guys have to stop taking everything so literally. Do I need to mark my comments like Brigade 17 below with the word “sarcasm/” ?
Cannoli - February 3, 2012
Vogel=Jim Schartz
T.Moore - February 2, 2012
KLove>Dwight Howard now?
Booz, Noah, Brew, and Charlotte pick for KLove?
/sarcasm
Brigade17 - February 2, 2012
That wouldn't be a bad deal, to be honest.
You end up with a great starting lineup and keep a lot of the bench strength.
Start DRose/Rip/Lu/Love/Omer, bring in CJ/KK/Butler/Taj off the bench. Pile up wins and have a better chance at beating Miami than you do now, most likely.
You have the best pick and roll/pop in the league with Rose and KLove, you win the battle on the glass every night and you have seriously amazing spacing on offense with Love and Lu out there. If you’re facing a team without much of a threat at the 2, you can even start Kyle, keep the lane wide open by having Love, Deng and KK hang at the perimeter and watch DRose knock in layup after layup.
dakoose - February 2, 2012
Nah, I think that's waaaaay too much for someone as unproven as KLove.
I really like the guy, and he’s a GREAT player, don’t get me wrong, but I’d be uneasy over the fact that his team still isn’t very good.
wrigleyrocker12 - February 2, 2012
Well, you'd have to get into my mind a little bit here to really understand why I'd do the deal.
Let’s make it clear; I think Carlos Boozer is a stinkfest and he doesn’t help this team win, so I’d be glad to get him off this team in any capacity. With Joakim, he’s good, but I don’t think there’s a huge gap in production between him and Jomer. Jo is better, but basically with this deal I’m giving up Boozer, who I’m glad to get rid of, and then giving away Noah, Brewer and a three-years-down-the-road pick for a guy who’s a great compliment to DRose.
Brewer’s nice, but I think Butler can give you some of what Brewer does and within a year or two he’ll probably be just as good.
dakoose - February 2, 2012
While I have a totally different opinion on Boozer...
I don’t know if I would do it even if it was for Noah, Brew, the pick, and Taj. The offensive dropoff between Jo and Omer is that big IMO.
wrigleyrocker12 - February 2, 2012
...I wouldn't do that for Love...Dwight sure
But Love?
T.Moore - February 2, 2012
replace noah with taj
gogogogogo
Prevenge - February 2, 2012
Did we just LOSE to the SIXERS by 16(!!!!!!!!!!!) pts??
Oh wait, 3/4 of the team is injured and the Sixers are actually good this year. Still sucks to lost by 16 pts!
BullsFan22 - February 2, 2012
That justifies my KLove tshirt purchase last year.
wrigleyrocker12 - February 2, 2012
Why are people so in love with what kevin said but feel like derrick should STFU and not voice his opinion.
smh
Slick Ric - February 2, 2012
If Derrick came out and said
“I hate Indiana and they’re a bunch of fake ass tough-guys,” I wouldn’t have a problem with it, especially after the hard fouls he’s taken from them. But he came out after losing and was salty about their celebrating. Well….if you don’t want them to celebrate, win the damn game for your team. Don’t pass to Scalibrine for the game winning shot.
dakoose - February 2, 2012
not to mention
with Kevin Love, he probably saying it with some actual emotion and feeling behind it. He probably REALLY DOES hate them. When Rose says stuff, it just comes off as mechanical, robotic, and with not much emotion. Not that he didn’t mean it, but it would be harder to believe it. If they both said the same thing, I would believe it more out of Love’s mouth.
NormVanBeer - February 2, 2012
Kevin Love sucks. He is getting good stats, but they are mostly padded because he plays for MN.
I mean, think about it, what have T-Wolves since Kevin “Bar Fight” Garnett left town? Exactly. Next.
BullsFan22 - February 2, 2012
But but
Rubio! NEXT STEVE NASH!!!
T.Moore - February 2, 2012
He doesn't suck, at all.
He’s just not good enough to carry a team to anywhere that matters. As your second option he’s fantastic.
dakoose - February 2, 2012
right...
he “sucks”. Be sure to note that insight on your application to become an NBA scout (or ball boy, as the case may be).
Paul Warfield - February 2, 2012
Who told Derrick to stfu after that?
Personally I don’t think he even realizes that what he says is gonna be a big deal. It’s guys like KC that are in the Derrick Rose myth making business that lets these things get carried away.
He was probably just sitting there all pissed off, and the media started talking and he was being honest that he couldn’t believe they were celebrating like that. He’s not like Kobe where he’s super aware and always trying to build himself up
Juiceboxjerry - February 2, 2012
seriously..thaqt booz pic looks like he's screaming for a high 5 gone wrong
Belize - February 2, 2012
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Blog a Bull to post a comment.