SB Nation - Login for mobile commenting

Blog a Bull

Bulls 121, Kings 115: Great rebounding keeps Bulls in games, but bad rebounding gives lesser teams chances

No matter how you slice it, the Bulls' win over the Kings on Tuesday night was a fun game to watch. There was plenty of comedy to go with hustle. And where the score implies more drama than there actually was, it's reflective of two teams battling to push the ball down each other's throats.

The Bulls offense was about as aggressive as you would want. There was no Derrick Rose (back spasms), but the last thing lacking was speed and explosion. Joakim Noah (22 points on 7-for-11, 6-for-9 at the rim, 8-for-9 at the line, 11 rebounds, four blocks) consistent held the Kings back from getting rewarded for some very strong defense by punishing them for over-committing to the ball. Luol Deng (23 points on 6-for-17, 4-for-5 at the rim, 9-for-9 at the line, 11 assists, seven rebounds) moved the ball and nailed open shots creating off the ball, exploiting those same aspects like, well, an All-Star capable of point forward elements.

Best for the Bulls is that they started this six-game homestand with a bang, not having to stretch too many minutes, in a game without their superstar reigning MVP. Deng played 42 minutes, but that's just how things go -- especially with Richard Hamilton still out, stretching Ronnie Brewer's playing time. Noah played 36 minutes, but Taj Gibson's (15 points on 7-for-8) ultra-aggressiveness and Omer Asik (seven rebounds, +16) prevented him from playing stretches too long in the second half.

Carlos Boozer (16 points on 7-for-14, 4-for-5 within ten feet in 24 minutes) was another highly bright spot, slaying some good on-ball defense. Him an Noah being aggressive off the ball completely changes the Bulls offense into a big boy bunch with reserves to not wear them out. It's difficult to ignore wishing this could be seen every night; and the ways they were using their size, fighting for position, and making moves were ways to play the game that give your the desired results, no matter who's the opponent.

Home sweet home, indeed.

Team
OffEff
DefEff
Poss
EFG%
TOR
ORR
FTR
SAC
117.3
123.5
98
52.2
14.3
35.4
31.5
CHI
123.5
117.3
57.7
13.3
23.7
31.0

Star-divide

  • Awful rebounding kept the Kings in the game. No offense to the Kings, as the Bulls man- and help-defense really wasn't so bad. In isolation, highly skilled Kings players made great moves and hit some crazy shots. Moreover, they fought in a commendable way for loose balls in ways that should accumulate 15-20 more wins for this team over the last months of the season, IMO. That said, rebounding is supposed to be the Bulls' Old Reliable. They're way too big, athletic, and skilled to piss away great before-the-ball-is-in-the-air defense by allowing 25 second chance points to anyone -- let alone the Kings -- on 17 offensive rebounds [.pdf].
  • Going into Thursday's matchup with the Celtics, there's an offensive formula to beat the crap out of them. The Cs aren't a strong rebounding team, but it's tough to move the ball well against. If the bigs and Deng just stay as active as they were on Tuesday, the Cs aren't going to slow them down with physicality. Moving through space, finding open men, and aggressively cutting to the basket without the ball will get the ball where the Bulls should never get beat: above the rim. The injury bug has hurt, though. After winning six of their first seven against teams on pace to make the playoffs, they've lost five of six.
  • Limited amounts of long-2s made this game a blast as a fan. The 3-pointer is a more efficient shot and gets a rise, as does watching the best basketball players in the world aggressively pushing the ball toward the basket. The Bulls and Kings provided great entertainment with 36 and 47 shots at the rim, going 9-for-19 and 9-for-17 on 3s, and only taking 17 and 15 shots on long-2s, respectively. The Kings are more talented than their record and they're playing well since replacing Paul Westphal with Keith Smart at the head coaching position -- and it showed through both teams playing a well-coached game.
  • More Deng-Big pick n' roll please. Deng's a strong man. He makes up for ugly-looking ball-handling by keeping his strong bdy between defenders and the ball. We saw his slow down and not charge full force as the handler in the PNR game -- and it looked great. He isn't the next point forward of the NBA, but with the Bulls' bigs and 3-point shooters using space, this could be a great weapon to allow Rose to rest here and there on offense. It only works when teams are over-committing their help, though. The Heat and Cs and Sixers may help too well, but all help Ds over-commit from time-to-time and if he can switch gears with his pace to make interior passes like Tuesday night more often, the Bulls offense gets a bit more dangerous, as the height is just further utilized.
  • Noah talked Noah stuff and Lin-sanity on Wednesday's PTI.
  • Neither C.J. Watson (.456 3P%), nor Kyle Korver (.424 3P%) were chosen for All-Star Weekend's 3-Point Shootout. And that really shouldn't be surprising.
  • The Bulls starting lineup with Brewer instead of Hamilton has been the most efficient in the NBA this season (min. 100 MP). That's right: Basketball-Reference.com just made me lose my shit.

Advanced Box Score via Hoopdata.

    3 recs  |  51 comments

    Comments

    What does that stat mean at the end, most efficent lineup in basketball?

    Could someone explain this to me please, thanks!

    Largest point differential per 100 possessions
    mindfu**ed is what it is
    Jarring dissonance

    This game is perfect example of how deeply misleading the +/– metric can be when applied narrowly. Omer “Stone Hands” Asik was +16, while Noah, who undoubtedly played one of his best games of the season, was a –10.

    I wouldn't really call it a metric & it's largely useless for one player without a huge sample....

    But in a game where the Bulls struggled to rebound, his 6 defensive rebounds in those 12 minutes were meaningful to kill Kings possessions.

    Call it what you like

    it’s largely useless for one player without a huge sample

    Precisely my point.

    on the other hand, boozer's -12 was the worst on the team and-- contra alex-- i think that

    is a very accurate description of his contribution last night.

    although maybe im wrong. heres alex:
    Carlos Boozer (16 points on 7-for-14, 4-for-5 within ten feet in 24 minutes) was another highly bright spot, slaying some good on-ball defense

    i suppose i agree with that if its a reference to his effect on his own team.

    How the hell is James Jones AND Chalmers in it

    But no CJ, hell or Ray Allen? Jones is barely shooting 40%.

    cj sucks, Korver shouldve made it
    jones only made it cause he's the defending champ

    doubt they would have invited him otherwise

    The new Play Index is a thing of unparalleled beauty.

    I now know Kobe is 2/6 in shots attempted in the final minute to either tie or take the lead, Durant is 5/11, Rose is 3/5 and LaMarcus Aldridge is 4/4.

    What exactly are you using for that?
    Play index tool. It's new
    This tool really is fantastic

    First finding, most supposedly “clutch” players are really just very good players that take a ton of game tying/winning shots and miss most of them. Trailing by 2 or less in the final minute (last year), shots to tie or take the lead: Rose 3/8, Durant 5/17 (yikes), LeBron 2/7, Wade 1/4 and yet David West 8/12. What??!?!

    The Chris Paul Effect
    What about getting to the line?
    Recced for Play Index alone...

    Flagged because I will spend too much time fiddling with it…

    We are going to need to start a new thread just for the awesome stuff we find

    Cause this thing is freakin sweet.

    I started a new thread just for play index + stuff.

    http://www.blogabull.com/2012/2/16/2802291/new-play-index.

    Boozer and Taj combined for 7 rebs in 48 minutes

    Taj was especially pathetic with 2 rebs in 24 minutes. Noah has started to get it going and I’m excited about that. Still, I’m waiting for one of Taj or Boozer to step up and become completely players. We need Taj to get some consistency on the offensive end, and Boozer to bring consistent effort on the defensive end. And the rebounding has to be there every game. Cousins and Thompson had more offensive rebounds (13 combined) than Taj and Boozer had total rebounds.

    I don’t want to rip Boozer, but he was not a bright spot Tuesday. He had 5 fouls in 24 minutes, mostly from reaching. When he was the court, Evans and Thornton had a field day on the pick and roll. I don’t know if its effort or ability but he doesn’t move his feet. I believe in 3 of the last 5 broadcasts I’ve seen, the color guy (definitely Stacey and JVG, and I think an opposing team brodcast as well) showed Boozer unwillingness to take a charge. Considering that he is almost a complete non-threat to block shots, I think he should be at least attempting to take charges.

    Don’t get me wrong, it was a total team breakdown defensively against the Kings – who knew the Bulls would struggle to contain penetration so much w/o Rose. JLIII can at times hold his own offensively, but he is a terrible defender, despite the effort. I thought Thibs kind of made the game more competitive than need be by playing JLIII and CJ together (the Bulls couldn’t get any stops), especially since Korver was playing well on both ends.

    All in all, teams are going to have games like this. The buy-in defensively wasn’t there but the Bulls still got the win. And I thought Korver-Deng-Noah looked truly fantastic Tues night, which was great to see.

    Taj

    We need Taj to get some consistency on the offensive end

    I agree, but part of the blame lies with Thibs, in my view. Sadly, Taj is the only Bulls player who finishes strong around the rim. He has also been developing some post moves. Yet despite this, and that his mid-range jumper has sucked badly this season, Thibs rarely uses him to post up.

    I believe that whatever potential he has will only be fully realized if he is given regular chances to post up. Otherwise, it is likely to remain mostly frustrating for all involved.

    so...

    you really dont like thibs do you….

    actually I do...

    but I believe that he could – and should – be more creative offensively.

    wow, this again, you really need to give up on thinking "thibs being Jesus" thing and Taj does not even have a good post up move...

    Your are strongly overrating Taj scoring ability. I have been saying this since last year playoffs…Tajs offense is equal to Boozer defense.

    i wouldnt go that far

    boozer defense is more of a myth than reality, thibs tells us it exists, just never have seen it. Ive seen flashes of efficient offense from taj….

    I'd suggest...

    that you don’t know what you’re talking about.

    Taj is shooting 69% at the rim, close to 62% within nine feet of the basket, and 33% from beyond that distance.

    No one suggested that he was an outstanding scorer – or anything close. What I have suggested repeatedly is that he would be much better used around the basket, than shooting mid-range jumpers.

    i think hes too undersized to do well consistently in the post
    that is a fair point...

    I agree that he would need to be used only under certain matchup conditions.

    Taj has never been a particularly good rebounder, but this season he's been even worse.
    But But

    Better than boozer!

    I guess all those reports about Boozer's elite defense before he got to the Bulls were all wrong.

    You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Blog a Bull to post a comment.